Neil P. Anthony, partner at Steinger, Greene & Feiner, has reached a $2.5 million settlement on behalf of client Kimberly Rovner, who was injured in a collision involving a company vehicle operated by a Beacon Roofing Supply employee.
The case, which began with a complete denial of liability and a $0 offer, evolved into a landmark result through strategic litigation work, early identification of legal precedent, and comprehensive documentation of the client’s injuries and medical history. The final outcome underscores Steinger, Greene & Feiner’s approach: when the defense refuses accountability, we double down.
The Incident
The crash occurred on June 11, 2022, at Hawks Cay Resort in Monroe County. Kimberly, a Wellington resident and grandmother, was riding as a passenger in a golf cart when it was struck by a Beacon Roofing Supply salesman. The driver had reportedly been drinking throughout the day at what the defense referred to as a “sales meeting,” though evidence supported it was a company-sponsored social event with alcohol expenses covered.
After the incident, Kimberly was transported for emergency care. Injuries included trauma to her cervical and lumbar spine and a wrist fracture. Multiple scans, physical therapy, and follow-up treatments revealed complications that would impact her for the foreseeable future. These records, along with EMS reports and follow-up diagnostics, would later prove critical to building the case.
Turning the Case Around
Like many of our personal injury clients, Kimberly’s story was met with resistance. The defense attempted to minimize the significance of the event and deflect corporate responsibility. The driver had limited coverage. The employer denied fault. But Neil and the team pressed forward, confident that the law and the facts were on our side.
Before filing, the legal team identified Carroll Air Systems v. Greenbaum, a Fourth DCA decision that provided a clear path to overcome the summary judgment threats Beacon’s defense was leaning on. The precedent affirmed that employers can be held liable for injuries caused during events where alcohol is provided and employee conduct can be linked back to the company.
With that groundwork laid, we submitted a formal UM demand to Hartford Insurance. The carrier declined to offer a settlement. That decision opened the door for full litigation.
The Resolution
The defense’s strategy hinged on painting our client as partially responsible or exaggerating her injuries. But they underestimated the strength of the facts, the clarity of the medical record, and the consistency of Kimberly’s statements from the start.
After extensive discovery and pre-trial work, a resolution was reached: $2.5 million—half a million more than our initial demand. The settlement accounts for past and future medical care, income loss, and non-economic damages stemming from the accident.
This outcome wasn’t just about a number. It was about recognition. A national company attempted to sidestep responsibility for an employee’s actions. We didn’t let that happen.
Why This Case Matters
This case is a firm-level example of how we combine persistence, precedent, and people-first advocacy. It reflects our car accident lawyers’ ability to maximize results even in contested liability cases with underinsured coverage. And it’s a reminder that behind every demand letter is a real person who came to us when others wouldn’t listen.
Congratulations to Neil Anthony and the litigation team for another powerful result that speaks directly to our values and our commitment to justice.
See how we’ve helped other clients win the compensation they deserved.