I Love My Attorney

I Love My Attorney

Steinger, Greene & Feiner was founded over 20 years ago with a singular mission in mind: to get compensation for those who have been injured due to the negligence of others. As we continue to fight for the injured, we will ensure each, and every client is so pleased with their results that they can proudly shout “I love my attorney!”.

“Our goal is to ensure each of our clients recoup their losses and is paid for their suffering. Our mission is to make sure they leave every meeting happier than when they arrived.” – Michael Steinger.

Our attorneys work with you during the most stressful and important moments in your life. We see you when you are injured, when you are managing difficulties and when you are at your most vulnerable.

It’s our job and our mission to fight for you when you cannot fight for yourself; to advocate for you and to ensure that you get the compensation you deserve and that you are made whole after the pain and suffering you endured.

“At Steinger, Greene & Feiner, clients become family. And we fight for family.” – Sean Greene.

I Love My Attorney. It’s a phrase we hear from clients after fighting for them in depositions, after batting for them against insurance companies and it’s the phrase they say when we finally make them whole again at the end of a legal battle. It’s why we have pushed our no fee guarantee. If we don’t win, you don’t pay us.

“We work tirelessly to ensure that every client is made whole again.” – Michael Feiner.

At Steinger, Greene & Feiner, we change the lives of our clients every day. We offer clients the opportunity to build new lives after getting them compensation they deserve.

Clients like Christina

Christina Steinger, Greene & Feiner testimony “I called Steinger, Greene & Feiner because I needed help with my accident, I didn’t know the process and they just made it way easy for me. I love my attorney.”


And others like Chris

Steinger, Greene & Feiner Client “Steinger, Greene & Feiner were fast and they treated me like family. My attorney got everything I deserved. I love my attorney.”


Are you the next Steinger, Greene & Feiner Client? We will help you get the money you deserve and make sure that your voice is heard. We welcome those who are injured to call, to speak with one of the lawyers in the Steinger, Greene & Feiner family and to become family yourself.

Each and every attorney at Steinger, Greene & Feiner represents a client who has suffered and deserves compensation for their suffering. Our slogan is “I love My Attorney”, our promise is to fight for your compensation so you too will be saying it. I LOVE MY ATTORNEY!

About The Author

Michael Feiner

Michael Feiner

The Florida BarFlorida Bar Young Lawyers DivisionMillion Dollar Advocates ForumMillion Dollar Advocates ForumBest Workers Compensation Attorneys in MiamiBest Car Accident Lawyers in MiamiLawyers of distinction

Michael A. Feiner is a partner in the Fort Lauderdale office of Steinger, Greene & Feiner. Since being admitted to the Florida Bar in 2001, Michael has devoted his practice to representing plaintiffs throughout Florida in various tort and strict liability cases and has successfully litigated cases against national insurance companies, large public companies, and governmental agencies, resulting in tens of millions of dollars for his clients. He has handled all types of personal injury and wrongful death cases on behalf of plaintiffs, including automobile negligence, premises liability, medical malpractice, product liability, dog bites, and sexual harassment. Michael’s product liability case against Microsoft, as well as his representation of victims of sexual harassment and abuse by physicians, has garnered him important media attention at both the local and national levels. Michael is an experienced trial lawyer and successfully argued an appeal to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. In the reported decision Ortlieb v. Butts, 849 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Michael persuaded the Fourth District Court of Appeal that a directed verdict on liability was appropriate where the defendant did not rebut the presumption of negligence of a rear driver in a rear-end collision.